Service

AI-Native Development

Agentic tooling as the primary build method. Architecture and review stay human.

We build for founders using agentic tools — Claude Code as the primary driver — as the actual engineering method, not a demo trick. The difference from vibe coding: architecture, data model, and security boundaries are decided by a senior engineer, evals run as a CI gate instead of a vibe check, and every commit gets reviewed for the failure modes AI-generated code tends to ship. We're also the team founders call to fix the codebases that skipped this discipline — see Vibe Code Rescue.

Get a flat-price quote Read the FAQ

From$6,000·5–10 days·Flat price, your code from day one.

Senior

“We're the team founders call when AI-native went wrong (see Vibe Code Rescue) — we know exactly which shortcuts not to take”

Stack

“Agentic tooling used transparently, with a senior engineer as the architecture and security backstop, not a rubber stamp”

Approach

“Evals and CI gates from day one, not bolted on after the first production incident”

Pricing

“Same flat-price, your-code-from-commit-one terms as every other engagement — no markup for the tooling”

Day 1

“Scoped build (feature, internal tool, or MVP slice) shipped via agentic-driven implementation, human-reviewed every commit”

Handoff

“Code review pass specifically hunting the failure modes AI-generated code tends to ship”

What you get

Concrete deliverables.
Not a slide deck.

Scoped build (feature, internal tool, or MVP slice) shipped via agentic-driven implementation, human-reviewed every commit

Architecture, data model, and auth boundaries decided by the engineer — never delegated to the agent

Evals and automated checks as a CI gate, so AI-authored code can't regress silently

Full commit history — you see what was agent-drafted versus hand-written, not one opaque squash commit

Code review pass specifically hunting the failure modes AI-generated code tends to ship

Why us

The shape of the work matters.

We're the team founders call when AI-native went wrong (see Vibe Code Rescue) — we know exactly which shortcuts not to take

Agentic tooling used transparently, with a senior engineer as the architecture and security backstop, not a rubber stamp

Evals and CI gates from day one, not bolted on after the first production incident

Same flat-price, your-code-from-commit-one terms as every other engagement — no markup for the tooling

Available in

AI-Native Development in your city.

AustinUnited States New YorkUnited States San FranciscoUnited States Los AngelesUnited States SeattleUnited States AtlantaUnited States

We also serve Denver, Boston, Miami, London, Tel Aviv.

FAQ

Questions founders ask.

How fast can you start?

Most builds begin within seven days of the first call. We don't sell discovery — we go from problem statement to first deploy on the same day-one timeline.

Is the price really flat?

Yes. After a 30-minute call we send a single number and a scope you can accept or reject. No hourly billing, no change-order games. If we underestimate, we eat it.

Isn't this just vibe coding with extra steps?

No — the difference is who owns architecture and review. Vibe coding means accepting whatever the agent outputs. AI-native means the agent drafts, a senior engineer decides the data model, auth boundaries, and what actually ships, with evals as a CI gate instead of a vibe check.

Which tools do you use?

Claude Code as the primary driver for most of the codebase, with Cursor for targeted work when it fits better. Tool choice adapts to the codebase — what doesn't change is that architecture and code review stay human.

Who owns the code?

You do, from commit one. The repository is created in your GitHub org. Infrastructure is provisioned in your cloud account. We don't host your stack on ours and we don't lock you in.

Ask anything